Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 39(4): 513-518, Jul-Aug/2013. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-687309

RESUMO

Purpose To evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of the use of propiverine and terazosine combination in patients with LUTS and DO by a placebo controlled study. Materials and Methods One hundred patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups (each group consisted of 50 patients). Terazosine and placebo were administered to the patients in Group 1 and terazosine plus propiverine HCL was administered to Group 2. The patients were evaluated by international prostate symptom score (IPSS), the first four questions of IPSS (IPSS4), the 8th question of IPSS (quality of life-QoL), overactive bladder symptom score questionnaire (OAB-q V8), PSA test, urodynamic studies, post voiding residue (PVR). All patients were followed for one year and were reassessed for comparison. Results IPSS, IPSS4, OAB symptoms, QoL score, PVR, and Qmax scores of the groups did not differ. After one year treatment, there was significant improvement in IPSS, IPSS4, OAB symptoms, QoL and Qmax values in Group 2. No significant improvement was noted for the same parameters in Group 1. Conclusion This is the first study to show long term safety and efficacy of anticholinergic therapy for patients with LUTS. In patients with OAB or DO, long term anticholinergic treatment may be regarded as a treatment option. .


Assuntos
Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Benzilatos/uso terapêutico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Prazosina/análogos & derivados , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Prazosina/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 38(6): 795-801, Nov-Dec/2012. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-666015

RESUMO

Purpose

To compare totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy procedures on many parameters. Materials and Methods

Percutaneous nephrolitotomy was performed on 195 patients between June 2009 and May 2012. The data of those patients were evaluated retrospectively. Totally tubeless cases were enrolled to Group 1, and Group 2 consisted of non-tubeless cases (re-entry or Foley catheter). Results

Group 1 included 85 cases and group 2 a total of 110 patients. Paper tracing values for the kidney stones were 321.25 ± 102.4 mm2 and 324.10 ± 169.5 mm2 respectively. Mean fluoroscopy time was 4.9 ± 1.9 min and 5.08 ± 2.7 min, mean operation time was 78.8 ± 27.9 min and 81.9 ± 28.77 min and mean decrease in hematocrit was 2.6 ± 1.6 and 3.74 ± 1.9 respectively. All these comparisons were statistically significant. Length of hospitalization was 1.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 1.5 days for Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Mean superficial pain score was 5.8 ± 1.6 and 6.7 ± 1.2 respectively for both groups after 1 hour. At 6 hours, the scores changed to 3.87 ± 1.22 and 4.84 ± 1.3 respectively. The analgesic dose was 1.00 ± 0.7 and 1.53 ± 0.6 for the groups respectively at 6 hours. All the statistical differences were significant for these three parameters. Conclusions

We believe that, because of their post operative patient comfort and decreased length of hospital stay, totally tubeless procedures should be considered as an alternative to standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy. .


Assuntos
Humanos , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Nefrostomia Percutânea/instrumentação , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cateterismo Urinário
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA